![]() ![]() ![]() Interestingly, the users of those 3 editors sometimes switch but almost always to another editor on the list. ![]() Is a pretty good first order approximation. Sure, the guy in the next cubicle uses Emacs to program in Basic and not very well at that and the polyglot wizard on your team turns out to prefer Nano for reasons that no one can understand but serious_programmer = uses When I see someone using notepad or a similar abomination, I can be pretty sure the above does not apply.Īre there exceptions? Of course but I think the generalization is a good one. When I see an engineer using one of those editors I can be pretty sure that they know more than a single language, care about their tools and take the time to optimize their work flow around those tools, and care about speed and making development as frictionless as possible. One of the things I have found throughout my career is that serious programmers pretty much stick to one of two (arguably three) editors: Emacs or Vi(m), and on OS X, TextMate. Foley lists the usual suspects (extensibility, Org Mode, GUI or CLI operation, excellent built-in documentation, configurability, Tramp, and all the other reasons we love Emacs) for his decision to forgo IDEs, such as Eclipse, in favor of Emacs. Vincent Foley over at Occasionally sane has an interesting post entitled Why I Still Use Emacs. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |